Mon premier blog

Taking the Red Pill: Science, Philosophy and Religion in The Matrix Glenn Yeffeth, David Gerrold
Publisher: Summersdale

The Enlightenment In Continental Philosophy since 1750, the Rise and Fall of Self, Solomon presents a provocative thesis – Enlightenment atheists did not set out to 'disprove' the existence of God. I agree 100% if you please realize religion is NOT the same as TRUE relationship with Christ Jesus as this is the ONLY way of escape. You're not finished taking red pills yet. A blog about freethought, skepticism, philosophy, science, law, religion, human rights, and whatever else interests us. As most readers will know, the concept of the Matrix (the surface fabrication of our reality) is known and was popularized by the movie of the same name. What if it were as easy as taking a pill to forget the hard truths we have learned and go back into the "Matrix" (religion)? This, now, is common knowledge. And of course, he takes the red pill and is immediately 'awakened' from the world of illusion he was once living in, the Matrix. Sawyer wrote an essay in the anthology 'Taking the Red Pill: Science, Philosophy and Religion in The Matrix' entitled 'Artificial Intelligence, Science Fiction, and THE MATRIX'. You take the red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.” The offer still stands. Movies of all time, the Matrix. My post about a forgetting pill to erase painful memories got me thinking. I for one choose the red pill, you can choose to stay on the farm and let these leeches get fat on your blood, sweat and tears. Would you choose the "blue pill" and reenter the Matrix? Although the movie is fiction, it has very symbolic and philosophical undertones that represent the nature of reality and our human desire to learn more about the truth of our existence. Rather, they pushed He was describing The Matrix. It fostered a utilitarian conception of science divorced from a moral base. I was not impressed and although I can agree to a good degree, I have to say that there are far to many extreme and inflexible statements and one sided philosophical arguments made in this video.